> Why then are we discussing an impossible situation? The only people discussing it are you and I, and we are discussing it because you brought it up. If you d

> Why then are we discussing an impossible situation? The only people discussing it are you and I, and we are discussing it because you brought it up. If you don't know why you wanted to talk about it, I guess the question is unanswerable. Everyone else was quite explicitly talking about Communist states, which means we know that the topic was about states under rule by the Communist Party. That is not an impossible situation. That is a very real situation. But communism has no state. That is one of its defining features. We know that "Communist state" fundamentally cannot refer to communism. > Why not discuss Magicism Well, since you also brought it up, I guess we can. But there is no evidence I am aware of that indicates magic is a thing. I am not sure where you could go with it. Post-scarcity is a thing. According to the UN we are already there when it comes to food. Shelter has been more elusive to get us all the way to "full" post-scarcity, with it still being approximately as difficult to build a house today as 200 years ago, but slow progress is being made. It is quite conceivable that some kind of technology could change the game there, as has already been done for food. Yet, despite already having the technology to lift us from food scarcity, many people go hungry each day. Communists will blame that kind of mismatch on capitalists creating a situation of artificial scarcity. Cases like the Monsanto story, of which you are probably familiar, provide some justification to their perspective. They believe that socialism is the only way to overcome that hurdle in order to pave the way to post-scarcity. Theories can be off base, but one can at least understand where they are coming from. Where do Magicists come from? What is the foundation of their theory?