> The landscape will be less open and diverse, handing the power to a few. Proponents of the regulation approach probably wouldn't state it this way, but if I'

> The landscape will be less open and diverse, handing the power to a few. Proponents of the regulation approach probably wouldn't state it this way, but if I'm understanding their arguments correctly, I think they want that, because regularing a few very powerful corporations is easy. Regulating a ton of small people/startups is hard. When you genuinely believe that some of the output from LLMs is literally dangerous to some people, it's not unreasonable to decide that the "freedom" of people to run and develop models to compete is unimportant compared to protecting society from dangerous text or images.