Please don’t. It’s unhelpful to the argument when you do this, and it makes our side look like a bunch of smug self entitled assholes. The reality is that AI

Please don’t. It’s unhelpful to the argument when you do this, and it makes our side look like a bunch of smug self entitled assholes. The reality is that AI is disruptive but we don’t know how disruptive. The parent post is clearly hyperbole; but let’s push back on what is clearly nonsense (ie. AI being more dangerous than nuclear weapons) in a logical manner hm? Understanding AI is not the issue here; the issue so that no one knows how disruptive it will eventually be; not me, not you, not them. People are playing the risk mitigation game; but the point is that if you play it too hard you end up as a ludite in a cave with no lights because something might be dangerous about “electricity”.