2 ms·
"This could inadvertently criminalize the activities of well-intentioned developers working on beneficial AI projects." It wouldn't be inadvertent. It's a cont
by Nifty3929 2y ago
"This could inadvertently criminalize the activities of well-intentioned developers working on beneficial AI projects."
It wouldn't be inadvertent. It's a control tactic.
"Placing liability on the creators of general purpose tools like these mean that, in practice, such tools can not be created at all, except by big businesses with well funded legal teams."
...
"These requirements could disproportionately impact open-source developers who often lack the resources of larger corporations to navigate complex regulatory processes."
...
"The proposed regulations create significant barriers to entry for small businesses and startups looking to innovate in the AI space."
That's the idea. The government likes a small number of big businesses that they can control.
- jahewson 2y agoHow about some liability placed on members of government for their hopeless legislating? As developers of law shouldn’t they accept responsibility for the harms they cause?