4 ms·
Yeah, one of the specific things I'd love to do is collaboratively bulking up WikiData more. It's missing a ton of low hanging fruit that people using an ML aug
by gaogao 2y ago
Yeah, one of the specific things I'd love to do is collaboratively bulking up WikiData more. It's missing a ton of low hanging fruit that people using an ML augmented tool could really make some good progress on, similar to ML assisted OpenStreetMapping work
- chottocharaii 2y agoThis isn't going to work so long as WikiData is controlled by admins that misapply the notability criteria to delete information they subjectively consider trivial I think the next frontier is a a wiki-style, collaborative site, deliberately purposed at storing information for LLMs
- andai 2y agoIs it bad that my first thought was "that's going to be a huge amount of work and end up with a lot of gaps and blind spots... we should have GPT-4 polulate it!" I think it could work if each entry has to be peer reviewed by 3 (more?) humans. Although, AIs are better than humans at captchas now, so I'm not exactly sure how that would work either way...