4 ms·
It's still pretty clearly far less wrong than stating 2/3 of bankruptcies are caused by medical costs. If people are arguing about whether the Earth is flat or
by trashtester 2y ago
It's still pretty clearly far less wrong than stating 2/3 of bankruptcies are caused by medical costs.
If people are arguing about whether the Earth is flat or spherical, you cant use the fact that both are "wrong" (as the Earth is closer to an ellipsoid) to say that "flat" is as correct as "spherical".
- singleshot_ 2y agoIf a study concludes that x/y bankruptcies are caused by z but makes no assertion of the total number of bankruptcies, I would be very suspicious that the author was forwarding his agenda via a weird counting methodology.