> So what would they correct? The best that can be done is like it is said in the article, apply filtering to refuse to answer. Stop providing service in the r

> So what would they correct? The best that can be done is like it is said in the article, apply filtering to refuse to answer. Stop providing service in the region in which your product is unable to comply with local regulations? You can't extract millions of euros from EU citizens with anything physical that goes against the EU law, but we like to pretend that because something's digital, it's totally fine if your product intentionally breaks the law, even if it's just for a couple of years until some random NGO sues you and courts react. I think that's nonsense. I'm not gonna say the EU needs its own equivalent of the Great Firewall, but there should be some cost of being intentionally non-compliant, as in fines, as in the same thing the EU already does to Facebooks and TikToks of the world.