3 ms·
I heard a story like that where someone had a vanity license plate “NONE” and kept getting cited for not having a plate.
by teh_infallible 2y ago
I heard a story like that where someone had a vanity license plate “NONE” and kept getting cited for not having a plate.
- thih9 2y agoIt was “null”: https://www.wired.com/story/null-license-plate-landed-one-hacker-ticket-hell/ https://www.wired.com/story/null-license-plate-landed-one-ha... > facing $12,049 of traffic fines wrongly sent his way. He’s still not sure if he’ll be able to renew his auto registration this year without paying someone else's tickets. And thanks to the Kafkaesque loop he’s caught in, it’s not clear if the citations will ever stop coming.
- vsnf 2y agoAn object lesson in getting funny with automated systems that have the power to inflict consequences.
- thih9 2y agoTo be fair, the consequences are very much inadequate. This should have been a letter saying “we allowed you to register that plate by mistake, change it asap”. If anything, this is a lesson to not build systems that can issue tickets to the wrong person - and allow the system’s decisions to be easily overridden at the very least.
- vsnf 2y agoThat's the takeaway for people in charge of the software development, sure. But really, is it even actually a lesson? To my knowledge, there was no accountability, no backlash, no one got fired or reprimanded, no manager was denied a promotion. What lesson was learned by the stewards of the system, really? Meanwhile, a lesson was very much learned by Mr. Tartaro who, as a DEFCON speaker, should have absolutely known better. He was playing with fire, and now he's suffering the consequences. I don't want to come across as defending the system in use, although it seems to be as much of a social issue as a technical one with people interpreting the text field as being invalid, but this was clearly a dumbass thing to do.
- thih9 2y agoThen again, if a DEFCON speaker didn't expect this level of a clusterfuck of an outcome, then who would have?