4 ms·
> I still have my KPIs to meet so I can only be understanding up to a point. If the KPI was set under the assumption that employees were going to work more tha
by Apreche 2y ago
> I still have my KPIs to meet so I can only be understanding up to a point.
If the KPI was set under the assumption that employees were going to work more than they are contractually required to, then that's not the employees problem. That's the fault of whoever set the KPI. They wrote a check they can't cash, and THEY should be the one to take the fall.
Either lower the KPI, or hire more and pay more so you have the resources to achieve them.
Funny how they can view the employees not doing extra labor as a problem. Meanwhile the management is effectively admitting incompetence. Isn't that a bigger problem?
- atomicnumber3 2y ago"Either lower the KPI, or hire more and pay more so you have the resources to achieve them." Nah, it's a lot easier to just overwork people until the good ones leave and the stuck people burn out, then fire them when you miss targets and then fire the line managers when you subsequently miss targets again because the team turned over.
- AndrewDucker 2y agoThat's what they're complaining about - that it's no longer easier to just overwork people, because the people are refusing to be overworked.
- M95D 2y ago... and they have no mechanism for firing managers in that situation. Right?