I find it very hard understand your paragraphs. > (when i eat a pizza) i simply burn fewer calories later to negate exercise, such as lowered BMR/NEAT. as i lo

I find it very hard understand your paragraphs. > (when i eat a pizza) i simply burn fewer calories later to negate exercise, such as lowered BMR/NEAT. as i lose weight my constraint is lowered. (constraint of what?) and any calories above it (above what?) will produce weight gain regardless of exercise. what does this have to do with pizza? eating pizza negates exercise through lower BMR/NEAT: umm are you sure it's negating exercise itself? so michael phellps cannot possibly burn off a pizza? it's physically impossible? felt compelled to comment cuz while i understand the terminology and know about this subject, i think its the particular form of writing that's just very hard to understand. thought you should know. edit: i think you're saying you can't out work a bad diet. i usually hear it from the opposite pov: if you fast your body will compensate through lowered BMR/NEAT and so it's diminishing returns. surprised to hear your point seems to be it's physically impossible to burn off a pizza because a pizza will negate (seemingly any and all attempts at) exercise. ???