3 ms·
The state should have reviewed the footage and not charged you in the first place. That should be codified into law because the state is doubly incentivized to
by cgriswald 2y ago
The state should have reviewed the footage and not charged you in the first place.
That should be codified into law because the state is doubly incentivized to do nothing about false positives. If you pay it, they get free money. If you don’t, they get free labor.
- ensignavenger 2y agoIn this case, the article clearly states that a human will review the footage... not sure what happened in the above cases, if there was no review, or if the review was simply rushed? I do think it would be fair if the state had to pay the same fine back to the person they incorrectly fined as compensation for their time.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]