2 ms·
> "Give your music away for free, hope for success, give a concert, make money." If it were always that simple, wouldn't everyone be doing it? You'll never see
by FuzzyDunlop 14y ago
> "Give your music away for free, hope for success, give a concert, make money."
If it were always that simple, wouldn't everyone be doing it? You'll never see an unsigned band making its fortune off an arena tour, for one. It wouldn't be able to afford to organise it.
A lot of bands that want to do it for a living will gig the usual local circuit until some label rep picks them up and funds an LP and bigger tour.
People will like to think they're no longer relevant, and a response to the old-hat ways of the biggest labels (Sony, EMI, etc.) has been an upsurge in indie labels. Much like game and book publishers, they do serve a purpose in giving bands they like a break, thus allowing them to put out a record or two and gig on the wider circuit. Those bands might never have had the finances to do that originally.
Hell, I was in one such struggling band a few years ago.
Anyway, I don't think selling music is a broken model. But I do think that other ways to empower fresh, unsigned bands are necessary. Much like technology has empowered entrepreneurs and helped many a startup scene to flourish.
- ZeroGravitas 14y agoA lot of bands that want to do it for a living will gig the usual local circuit until some label rep picks them up and funds an LP and bigger tour. Who owns the copyright to the LP in this scenario? I'm just wondering if there's much difference between giving your music away to fans and giving your music away to a label, except the fans won't use obscure accounting practices to make it seems like you owe them money.