If you strip the context from this interesting article, you are also left with an interesting point. That is: there is value in different perspectives and appr

If you strip the context from this interesting article, you are also left with an interesting point. That is: there is value in different perspectives and approaches to a problem, yet the more different the perspective the harder it is to explain to others. QM had to move forward as a slow-rolling wave for this reason (probably I thought of this case due to the horrifying example chosen by the author), while special and general relativity did not require that (instead GM was simply extremely hard to understand :-). But the example I find most interesting is Newton introducing* calculus to England in order to address bugs in celestial mechanics and prove that the orbits were elliptical.