3 ms·
Pretty bold of you to decide people who were killed (particularly non-Tesla owners) because of issues with drivers using Tesla's barely competent (at BEST) soft
by FireBeyond 3y ago
Pretty bold of you to decide people who were killed (particularly non-Tesla owners) because of issues with drivers using Tesla's barely competent (at BEST) software are "tolerable".
- toomuchtodo 3y agoI did not decide. Regulators have decided; the fleet retains the driver assist capability. Changes have been made of course to appease regulatory bodies, which is good and desirable. Ergo, this quantity and types of death incurred is within government regulator risk appetite. As mentioned up thread, irresponsible drivers hold the blame for deaths caused. If you can’t use the feature safely, you shouldn’t use it, or have access to it. Irresponsible drivers in non Tesla vehicles will continue to maim and kill others just fine on a daily basis (~40k deaths/year, ~109 per day). (I despise Elon too, but the data tells the story for us)