2 ms·
Not avoided altogether. Static checkers cannot possibly follow all code paths, and they generally err on the side of false negatives rather than risking too man
by kbolino 3y ago
Not avoided altogether. Static checkers cannot possibly follow all code paths, and they generally err on the side of false negatives rather than risking too many false positives causing people to disable them.
- dexwiz 3y agoI wasn’t aware they preferred type II errors. That makes sense, but I don’t really expect tools like that to work across modules.
- kbolino 3y agoIt depends on the specific tool and how it's configured. But that has been my experience with many tools configured with their recommended settings.