6 ms·
then why not MAAANG?. Much better acronym, but then I just say big N.
by wing-_-nuts 3y ago
then why not MAAANG?. Much better acronym, but then I just say big N.
- jkubicek 3y agoCan’t we just stick with FANG? Sure, the acronym doesn’t mean anything anymore, but at least everyone knows what it means.
- Fatnino 3y agoThe N stands for Microsoft
- fr0nk0hshun 3y agoThere’s no other option besides MANGA. Anything else is f-ing lame
- harithnawa52 3y agoGANMA
- harithnawa52 3y agoNicrosoft
- Anon4Now 3y agoNadellaSoft?
- alewi481 3y agoEven better, why don’t we just get rid of the unwieldy acronyms altogether and simply refer to them as “major tech companies”? It’s clearer and avoids the constant reshuffling every time the market shifts.
- tacticalturtle 3y agoPeople have a strange attachment to catchy mnemonics that Jim Cramer was using in 2014.
- phendrenad2 3y agoWe can still call Alphabet Google, just like everyone calls X Twitter. Clunky rebrands don't have to be accepted by everyone. Edit: Personally I'm in favor of sorting by present market cap, so it's MANGAM.
- sulam 3y agoIs this a reverse sort?
- bloppe 3y agoGoogle never rebranded. It's still Google. They just had all these unrelated moonshots like Verily and Waymo that didn't make sense to keep pretending were a part of Google.
- alecsm 2y agoIsn't the Google CEO also Alphabet CEO now because they didn't manage to make them 2 actual independent companies?
- touristtam 2y agoI wouldn't be surprised if the change was tax related.