3 ms·
The despicable whitewashing of the BHO campaign goes on. Maybe when the newspapers are threatened with looming bankruptcy will they treat that corrupt Chicago g
by mynameishere 18y ago
The despicable whitewashing of the BHO campaign goes on. Maybe when the newspapers are threatened with looming bankruptcy will they treat that corrupt Chicago gangster with equity (for the sake of sales). Until then, we're stuck with hagiography and cocksuckism writ on a grand strategic scale. The neocons are in firm, firm control. Expect hard-rightism in foreign policy, hard-lefism in domestic policy. Same as Bush. Nothing more disgusting than a sucker repeatedly warned.
http://timepassonline.blogspot.com/2008/12/jon-favreau-hillary-clinton-photo.html http://timepassonline.blogspot.com/2008/12/jon-favreau-hilla...
Yes, the drunk 19-year-olds define public thought. You voted for it, bitches.
- mattmaroon 18y agoPerhaps you mistook this site for Reddit?
- staunch 18y ago-3 points by mattmaroon 35 minutes ago | link Didn't he also write Swingers? Barack is so money, and he doesn't even know it. reply Looks like you both did tonight :-)
- mattmaroon 18y agoIt was a joke about the guy's name. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Favreau http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Favreau Not a ranting, nonsensical political diatribe. I can't help it if people here aren't film buffs I guess.
- davidw 18y agoWell, for that matter so did kalvin and the 10 people who voted for this article about politics.
- mattmaroon 18y agoThe article was chiefly about writing. It's fairly apolitical really. It just happens to be about a guy who writes for the President.
- davidw 18y agoThere would be zero story there without Obama.
- mattmaroon 18y agoThat doesn't make it political.
- mynameishere 18y agoPerhaps the person who submitted it did. Criticize the right person.
- mattmaroon 18y agoI'm pretty sure I did. It was an article about writing, followed by some sort of syphilitic anti-Obama diatribe.