The suggestion is literally not to sedate violent people “without due process.” Of course sedating actively violent people is within due process (which is why i

The suggestion is literally not to sedate violent people “without due process.” Of course sedating actively violent people is within due process (which is why it’s able to happen repeatedly), but presumably GP is suggesting something closer to acquiring a specific warrant or court order to authorize it. Of course this doesn’t address an emergency situation, so the alternatives are 1) more aggressive/more likely-to-be-deadly force, or 2) don’t stop them at all. Yes obviously we should strive for zero deaths in these encounters.