2 ms·
It seems like the regulators have finally caught up to these systems. I starting to wonder if these level 2 systems can even be made to be safe. Your effectivel
by abracadaniel 2y ago
It seems like the regulators have finally caught up to these systems. I starting to wonder if these level 2 systems can even be made to be safe. Your effectively trying to engineer around human behavior, and there’s no guarantee you can get people to use it safely.
- jonplackett 2y agoI remember them talking about this after the Uber crash - that there’s just no way for a person to remain engaged after hours of driving without incident. Although I think she was watching TV so…
- belter 2y agoWell Tesla has four months to solve it... "Elon Musk announces Tesla will unveil a ‘robotaxi’ on August 8" - https://edition.cnn.com/2024/04/05/business/elon-musk-tesla-robotaxi-august-8/index.html https://edition.cnn.com/2024/04/05/business/elon-musk-tesla-...
- dzhiurgis 2y agoWell by definition their entire purpose is to reduce attention needed for driving which is an invitation for distraction. I’d argue of distracted driver on autopilot than without one, but there’s more cases of abuse, and I doubt anyone has measured and compared net outcomes. Ergo it’s yet another moral panic about rocket-man-bad.
- Eddy_Viscosity2 2y agoReading this morning that China is going to let Tesla do FSD there. It's a great testing ground because when people start using it, you can get whatever results the Chinese government wants to get. Good results get kept in, crashes are a result of something other than FSD and don't get reported in the data. Win-Win!