> I think it's generally insulting to your audience to write with an LLM. If you don't care about what you're saying, why should someone care to read it? I do

> I think it's generally insulting to your audience to write with an LLM. If you don't care about what you're saying, why should someone care to read it? I do care about what I'm saying. That's why I review the LLMs output and edit before sending. If an LLM can express what I meant to say better than I can, why would I not use it? Personally, I don't do this because the LLM changes the style of my text too much and doesn't sound like me any more. But oh, I so do wish it could. Often I type a first draft of an email, and I know it needs (simple) editing. If an LLM could do it for me, I'd be very happy. For research papers, writing the introduction is a large headache, and frankly, is often more of a ritual. It's the least important part of the paper. I mean, if all I had to do is describe the purpose of my paper, etc, that would be great. But a lot of referees want me to load it up with a lot more verbiage to satisfy dubious traditions. Unfortunately, GPT can't do it for me. But it should.