Every service I run for all time will be exclusively ipv4. Ipv6 gets a heckler's veto from me for trying to do too much. Give me an addressing scheme and absol

Every service I run for all time will be exclusively ipv4. Ipv6 gets a heckler's veto from me for trying to do too much. Give me an addressing scheme and absolutely NOTHING ELSE - just like IPv4 - and I'll consider it. IPv6 does an order of magnitude more than just this one thing, and therefore is too complex to be a replacement as it adds a bunch of anti-features that I don't want anywhere near any of my networks for any reason ever. I am a permanent rejecter of all ipv6, both as a client and a server. For every downvote this post gets, I'm going to increase the number of sockpuppet acconts I automate in my crusade against ipv6 in all public forums by 1 order of magnitude. Each downvote will multiply the number of voices standing in opposition to your own desired outcome coming from my system by ten. Don't like it? Propose a better standard that fixes the address space problem without adding layers of shit on top of it next time. Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what to each for lunch, and for this particular subject, I can (and will) make more virtual anti-ipv6 wolves than there are pro-ipv6 sheep that are real humans. Don't like that? Demand a better governance system than democracy.