In this case, their analogy seems to be based on reality. The key point of their analogy is that buying another condo isn't a good solution to someone locking

In this case, their analogy seems to be based on reality. The key point of their analogy is that buying another condo isn't a good solution to someone locking you out of the one you paid for, just like buying a new phone isn't a good solution to Apple locking you out of your phone that you paid for. Your complaint with their analogy seems to boil down to "they used an analogy", without actually addressing the point above. Try to focus on the point instead.