2 ms·
That would be useful if you only need a try/catch at method level. If you need two try/catch chunks in a method then that wouldn't work. I do agree that havin
by AndrewDucker 14y ago
That would be useful if you only need a try/catch at method level. If you need two try/catch chunks in a method then that wouldn't work.
I do agree that having try/catch at method level would be useful in many ways - as an additional piece of syntax.