3 ms·
LOL. Your argument amounts to "the analysts who named a high number had no idea what they were talking about, and had no evidence" while "the analysts who named
by FireBeyond 3y ago
LOL. Your argument amounts to "the analysts who named a high number had no idea what they were talking about, and had no evidence" while "the analysts who named a lower number, with no evidence" were much better?
- FabHK 3y agoThe commenter names three publications that gave a lower number with good evidence, namely supply constraints.