4 ms·
While not written as a de jure ban, it is a de facto ban. China has said from the earliest ban attempts under Trump that they would not allow the divestment o
by falcolas 2y ago
While not written as a de jure ban, it is a de facto ban.
China has said from the earliest ban attempts under Trump that they would not allow the divestment of Chinese interests. Legislators knew this - they knew that the divestment would never happen, and so in my eyes, they wrote ban into law with a thin veneer of distraction.