> Could have been summarized as "I'm okay with my software being used to kill people and taking money for it". I don't understand. Are we supposed to start pol

> Could have been summarized as "I'm okay with my software being used to kill people and taking money for it". I don't understand. Are we supposed to start policing who is allowed or not allowed to use open-source and free software projects, which goes against these licenses themselves and their requirements? If you're against the NixOS Foundation taking money from Anduril, would you be opposed if the NixOS Foundation accepted the money and then would donate it back to Anduril? Because that would be functionally the same as not accepting the money and yet by your line of reasoning, it seems like you'd object even more to that. As far as I understand, the formal objection that was posted on another comment/thread was to the NixOS foundation advertising Anduril (not taking money from it or accepting contributions from it), which to me makes a lot more sense even though I don't have a strong opinion about it.