> To call them "pure garbage" is clear exaggeration. If that's true then fair enough, and I think your version of the comment is a nice middle ground. I've ne

> To call them "pure garbage" is clear exaggeration. If that's true then fair enough, and I think your version of the comment is a nice middle ground. I've never actually used github myself, and was only commenting on his tone of voice. If something is truly pure garbage, I think it should be said so, but I guess that's not the case here.