3 ms·

For 'serious' use I would always recommend ECC RAM.

• kube-system 3y ago
  If you're not running in two independent regions of tier 4 data centers, are you even really serious? /s There are 'serious' applications of technology that can tolerate memory faults.
  • kevindamm 3y ago
    only two? you know you should have N+2 deployment for real redundancy
    • scheme271 3y ago
      Only if N+2 is an odd number, otherwise you may end up with a split brain scenario
      • Zambyte 2y ago
        That's why I always do N=-1 replication :D
  • margalabargala 3y ago
    > There are 'serious' applications of technology that can tolerate memory faults. We can define "serious" use to mean "use where memory faults would be more expensive than buying ECC RAM" :)
    • vardump 2y ago
      Which is actually happens pretty easily. If you're using it professionally, the first time you use a day to debug something that turns out to be just ECC fault, you've lost the price advantage.
  • vardump 2y ago
    Not to mention multiplanetary!