Another post about Tailwind, another person claiming it's exactly equal to inline CSS eye roll. This one uses a "back to" qualifier, implying a historical revi

Another post about Tailwind, another person claiming it's exactly equal to inline CSS eye roll. This one uses a "back to" qualifier, implying a historical revision that inline styles were ever the sanctioned way! Good lord... There is plenty of info out there about why Tailwind, or rather utility-first in general, works in many situations. The "classic" way is still also appropriate. I use both depending on the project, though I really like Tailwind and is by far my favourite method most of the time. I say this as someone in their 40s who has been enjoying writing CSS since it was first introduced in the late 90s (yep, guilty of Stockholm Syndrome here).