Social Darwinism is not an incredibly useful term (and it's interesting the extent to which the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy buries it: I was going to tr

Social Darwinism is not an incredibly useful term (and it's interesting the extent to which the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy buries it: I was going to try and find you a better reference and to some extent failed https://plato.stanford.edu/index.html https://plato.stanford.edu/index.html), not to mention it's not a good concept, but that Wikipedia page is really not a good exploration of the topic. Nevertheless, note that Nietzsche is listed in the "proponents" section. Social Darwinism, when used as a concept by people in practice, has never been about a rigorous application of Darwin's theory.