3 ms·
DJI, in particular has a bunch of phone-home kill switch stuff built in. The FAA mandated a lot of it, and now I think they realize that, in practice, that mean
by hedora 3y ago
DJI, in particular has a bunch of phone-home kill switch stuff built in. The FAA mandated a lot of it, and now I think they realize that, in practice, that means they're mandating that the Chinese military has indirect control over drones operated by Americans on US soil.
I think it'd be better to ban remote kill switches and instead mandate GIS databases that warn you if you're violating airspace restrictions (for drones over a certain size, where this isn't adding a bunch of complexity).
Shielding domestic drone manufacturers from international competition essentially guarantees that we'll fall behind China. That will cause a national security issue worse than the current situation.
Sometimes I wonder if the regulators are intentionally screwing the US over, or if it's just that the federal government has become unable to coordinate the actions of its own agencies.
edit: The sibling comments are great examples of why we need strong privacy laws. If it was illegal for DJI to exfiltrate the data the drones gather back to their manufacturers, then those classes of national security issues would take care of themselves, and the rules would solve the problem for all industries, not just this one company.
- Ancapistani 3y ago> The FAA mandated a lot of it Source? I'm a Part 107 pilot, and none of the commercial stuff I fly has those restrictions.
- init2null 3y agoThere's an unlock mechanism in the DJI app for those with the appropriate license. There are plenty of restrictions without it.
- Ancapistani 3y agoI’m aware - but that’s a DJI thing, not an FAA requirement. I dumped DJI when I couldn’t get it to unlock for a job at an airport.
- init2null 3y agoDefinitely a DJI thing since the Autel is way, way less restricted. I got annoyed that a few little barely-used airstrips seemed to enforce limitations on the entire county.