4 ms·
it's not like Iran has a problem with Israeli embassies being bombed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1992_Buenos_Aires_Israeli_embassy_bombing https://en.wikipe
by compsciphd 2y ago
it's not like Iran has a problem with Israeli embassies being bombed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1992_Buenos_Aires_Israeli_embassy_bombing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1992_Buenos_Aires_Israeli_emba...
- ImHereToVote 2y agoTerrorism should be condemned. The article specifically states that they weren't state actors. As opposed to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Israeli_assassinations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Israeli_assassinations
- compsciphd 2y agoso lets get this straight, in your opinion, it's better for a state to fund a non state actor and direct them to do terrorist activities, than for the state to do it itself? i.e. the terrorism should be condemned but the state sponsor of the terrorism has clean hands. I'd argue just the opposite, the state sponsor of terrorism is actually worse than a state that takes action itself and doesn't delegate it to a 3rd party.