4 ms·
Did you ever consider there might be something wrong with your machine or some piece of software you’ve installed? Or do you think the rest of the world that h
by whynotminot 2y ago
Did you ever consider there might be something wrong with your machine or some piece of software you’ve installed?
Or do you think the rest of the world that has heaped praise on the Apple Silicon Macs has missed something you’ve seen?
- baq 2y agoI blame this on trying to use non-Apple hardware with the MacBook. I'm sure if I had an Apple Display instead of a g-sync 165Hz-capable monitor and closed the lid when hooked up everything would be... perhaps not fine, but good enough. The macbook is amazing when considered in isolation. Trying to use it in a workstation setting is definitely 'holding it wrong', which drives me nuts. Wasted potential and definitely undeserving of the 'Pro' moniker.
- whynotminot 2y agoI use it in a workstation setting. Two workstation settings in fact. I dock at home into a dual monitor setup. I go to work and dock into a dual monitor setup. I keep my MacBook open, not closed. Pretty much all my coworkers do the same. All with Apple silicon MacBook pros. No idea what you’re talking about. I believe you — I just think you need to do a deeper dive into your kit instead of assuming the rest of the world must be wrong about these machines.
- yareal 2y agoHuge plus one. I too bounce between environments with my MacBook. Never experienced any of the issues the gp describes, which to me sounds like something wrong with that device. Is it a Corp managed device?
- rcarmo 2y agoI have zero Apple displays out of the three or four I have in the office. They all work amazingly well -- often better than on Windows or Linux.
- lghh 2y agoI have a LG 38WN95C (3480x1600, 144hz, thunderbolt 3) monitor that's plugged into my Macbook Pro (M1 Pro _I think_, I'm not home to doulble check). The laptop is in clamshell and plugged in via Thunderbolt 3. IIRC, I had to turn the refresh rate down to 120hz, but otherwise it works well. The only hiccup is that if I unplug it, use it for a bit, and plug it back in I have to open the lid one time after plugging it in so it can realize it's plugged in to a display. I have a M3 Pro MacBook Pro for work that I also swap between on the display using the single cable that I remove from one to plug into the other. The laptop travels with me to work where it plugs into a 16:9 4k 60hz monitor while it's open. I have the same clamshell issue as my personal laptop where I have to open it once after plugging it in, but otherwise it works pretty well. I do however have to do some workspace rearranging when I go from clamshell->ultrawide to my work setup of open lid->16:9 monitor. But that's no a huge deal since I'm going from 1 screen to 2 screens.
- fragmede 2y agoI'm using one in a workstation setting with 1 big curved widescreen monitor and a multitude of keyboards and pointer devices, and it's great. It's fine in the workstation setting, you're holding it particularly wrong somewayhow
- deanishe 2y agoIt's a Mac. Of course there's something wrong with it. It's riddled with bugs Apple can't be bothered to fix. If it isn't WindowServer losing its mind, it's some other buggy system daemon. Apple simply does not do stable versions of macOS any more.
- seec 2y agoMost of the Apple Silicon praise is coming from delusional fanboys. It's only good for one thing and it is power efficiency. For the majority of people that are really into computers, that means jack shit and it is basically just some nice thing you may want to have if you really have to use a laptop from time to time. Most Apple laptops (especially the expensive ones) are used by executives and somewhat rich people who want to show off. I was an Apple technician in the past so I know very well how marketing really doesn't match the typical user, then you get irrelevant "praise". As someone who actually cared about Apple products, I wish they didn't switch their whole computer lineup to Apple Silicon. They could have kept making standard computers at the same time, but it would have been hard justifying such outrageous markup on ram and storage.