3 ms·
Although I find the notion of philosophy being like "the creation of concepts" rather limiting (philosophy can be this, but much more), if we stick with this no
by mykowebhn 2y ago
Although I find the notion of philosophy being like "the creation of concepts" rather limiting (philosophy can be this, but much more), if we stick with this notion, I still think it's not entirely correct.
If philosophy were to create concepts, then the question immediately arises of how one would determine whether these concepts were created correctly, or truthfully. The understanding here is that concepts are universal, and not contingent on anything, including on how they were "created". Instead, I think Deleuze should have defined philosophy as something like "the discovery of concepts, a discovery that, once accomplished, reveals to us something we had already known."
Full disclosure: I'm defining concept not in the regular, everyday way, but more in line with Hegelian, Idealist way--der Begriff.
- keiferski 2y agoI don’t think I’d call Deleuze “wrong” based on my one line description, if you haven’t read him yourself. The rest of your comment seems predicated on a Platonic idea of concepts; which is definitely not in line with how Deleuze thinks about things. His ideas are very much not in line with the typical way of thinking about concepts as universal things we discover. Edit: I should note here that I’m not an expert on Deleuze or Platonism, but I would probably say that Deleuze’s skepticism makes more intuitive sense to me.