2 ms·
It doesn't seem like "lawyer talk" to me. The original article really is "baseless" in that it utterly fails to establish, or even attempt to establish, any fac
by jeffbee 3y ago
It doesn't seem like "lawyer talk" to me. The original article really is "baseless" in that it utterly fails to establish, or even attempt to establish, any factual basis for its claims. Fatally it does not establish the key claim that search quality actually got worse.
- pclmulqdq 3y ago"Search quality got worse" is a widely-held opinion about a subjective measure (quality of search results). It's not a statement of fact at all.
- Eisenstein 3y ago> it utterly fails to establish, or even attempt to establish, any factual basis for its claims. You mean, besides all the directly quoted emails that were presented as evidence in a Federal court case?
- AlbertCory 3y agowhether or not that's true (and other replies here say it's not): they will always just deny without any specifics.
- jeffbee 3y agoA person who says they don't have hard data on search quality, but they know it's worse, is not making a serious argument.
- AlbertCory 3y agoThe original article had plenty of specificity.