2 ms·
It's equivalent to the 1.6nm != 1.6 nm though.
by exe34 3y ago
It's equivalent to the 1.6nm != 1.6 nm though.
- bee_rider 3y agoI mean, I get that this is a joke so I’m not going to over-analyze it, but using the fundamental physics constants as units is a totally reasonable thing to do, and nothing like using nm as a unit of… area? Density? Marketing term? It is a mess whatever it is.