4 ms·
Weird that for a couple minutes, these paths existed: * https://github.com/microsoft/MS-DOS/tree/main/v4.0/bin https://github.com/microsoft/MS-DOS/tree/main/v4
by rwl4 2y ago
Weird that for a couple minutes, these paths existed:
* https://github.com/microsoft/MS-DOS/tree/main/v4.0/bin https://github.com/microsoft/MS-DOS/tree/main/v4.0/bin
* https://github.com/microsoft/MS-DOS/tree/main/v4.0/bin/DISK1 https://github.com/microsoft/MS-DOS/tree/main/v4.0/bin/DISK1
* https://github.com/microsoft/MS-DOS/tree/main/v4.0/pdf https://github.com/microsoft/MS-DOS/tree/main/v4.0/pdf
But they disappeared as I browsed the repo. I guess they didn't want that part public?
Edit: I knew I wasn't seeing things! Somebody forked it along with those files:
https://github.com/OwnedByWuigi/DOS/tree/main/v4.0 https://github.com/OwnedByWuigi/DOS/tree/main/v4.0
- nullindividual 2y agoIt is all the MT-DOS content; binaries and docs.
- qingcharles 2y agoMulti-Tasking MS-DOS Beta Test Release 1.00 Release Notes Enclosed you will find Microsoft's first beta release of Multi-tasking MS-DOS. This version is based upon MS-DOS Version 2 sources, we will be reimplementing the multi-tasking enhancements on top of Version 3 sources shortly.
- electroly 2y agoThey just changed the folder. All of those files are now in https://github.com/microsoft/MS-DOS/tree/main/v4.0-ozzie https://github.com/microsoft/MS-DOS/tree/main/v4.0-ozzie
- willxinc 2y agoLooks like they were moved to the Ozzie subfolder: https://github.com/microsoft/MS-DOS/tree/main/v4.0-ozzie https://github.com/microsoft/MS-DOS/tree/main/v4.0-ozzie
- rnd0 2y agoThat was literally just added; I have a tab open that doesn't have that folder. This is wild and strangely exciting to see released in real time.
- shanselman 2y agoYa we wanted to separate the MS-DOS and MT-DOS stuff, it was confusing as it was
- rnd0 2y agoI'm not complaining, that's for sure! Thanks for all you're doing.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- farmerbb 2y agoThey force-pushed the repo to remove an insult towards Tim Patterson in one of the source files.
- esafak 2y agoDon't leave us hanging!!
- farmerbb 2y agoAt https://github.com/microsoft/MS-DOS/blob/main/v4.0/src/DOS/STRIN.ASM#L70 https://github.com/microsoft/MS-DOS/blob/main/v4.0/src/DOS/S... it used to have Tim Patterson's full name whereas after the force push they abbreviated it to his initials "TP". I had the repo cloned before the force push and when I went to pull it, this file was the only one that contained a conflict.
- esafak 2y agoLooks like the handiwork of Mark Zbikowski, whose initials adorn every EXE file. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Zbikowski https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Zbikowski
- farmerbb 2y agoMark is the one that committed today's source release, going off of the "MZ is back" commit message from GitHub user "mzbik".
- skissane 2y agoThey changed line 70 of v4.0/src/DOS/STRIN.ASM from [0]: ; Brain-damaged Tim Patterson ignored ^F in case his BIOS did not flush the to [1]: ; Brain-damaged TP ignored ^F in case his BIOS did not flush the [0] https://github.com/OwnedByWuigi/DOS/blob/ffd70f8b4fb77e2e6affbf1fad2fd8c349f0369f/v4.0/src/DOS/STRIN.ASM#L70 https://github.com/OwnedByWuigi/DOS/blob/ffd70f8b4fb77e2e6af... [1] https://github.com/microsoft/MS-DOS/blob/main/v4.0/src/DOS/STRIN.ASM#L70 https://github.com/microsoft/MS-DOS/blob/main/v4.0/src/DOS/S...
- shanselman 2y agoYa sorry we're moving stuff around
- rwl4 2y agoWell, thanks for putting this up! It's really a treasure for those of us who used it as our daily driver so many years ago.
- rozzie 2y agoThx for clearing the rights and for releasing, Scott. And of course thanks to Microsoft and IBM. It would be fun at some point down the road to get some of the older code building and running again - particularly '84/'85-vintage Windows & Notes builds. Quite a lot of work, though, not just because of hardware but also likely because of toolchain gaps.
- Karellen 2y agoWhy is that, no matter how much you check and proofread your work before you push/publish, you'll always find something obvious you missed 5 minutes after it's gone up? To change a public branch, or not to change a public branch, that is the question. Edit: Muphry's law strikes again - s/or to not/or not to/
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]