> Huh, it is rather insulting to people who are more willing to move and also stating top performers always stay stuck to same place. Not really. I'm not stati

> Huh, it is rather insulting to people who are more willing to move and also stating top performers always stay stuck to same place. Not really. I'm not stating a hard and fast rule, but a tendency. People with more options are far more likely to take action to avoid a major disruption to their lives, and people with fewer options are more likely put up with shit. I know if my employer decided to pack up and move to a new city, I'd almost certainly prefer to take another job locally than uproot nearly everything to move with them for little to no benefit to me.