3 ms·
There's precedent in other places (UDAAP) that a company is responsible for fuckery done on its behalf whether or not it directly ordered or even has direct kno
by banannaise 2y ago
There's precedent in other places (UDAAP) that a company is responsible for fuckery done on its behalf whether or not it directly ordered or even has direct knowledge of said fuckery.
We need more corporate regulations in that vein.
It should be impossible to outsource regulatory or legal risk. Outsourcing should subject you to a greater burden of oversight, not less.
- eli 2y agoDoesn't that enable framing your opponent with intentionally sloppy fake comments? Happens in the black hat SEO world all the time.
- banannaise 2y agoThis is why you keep a paper trail of who you've hired and have them keep a paper trail of what they've done. You can show what you've done and what you haven't! You could engineer some sort of conspiracy to keep specific misbehavior off the paper trail, but that's difficult. Increasing the difficulty of cheating is a good thing.