3 ms·
It's weird because in this case you could also read it as "Jeff Geerling says that corporate open source is dead", which just happens to be posted on his person
by WJW 3y ago
It's weird because in this case you could also read it as "Jeff Geerling says that corporate open source is dead", which just happens to be posted on his personal blog that has a domain name which is his personal name. It's not as if it's the site that called "Jeff Geerling" after all.
- OJFord 3y agoThe title should be as posted on the blog, it would be weird if he put Jeff Geerling there (and he didn't). Rule's the same for bloggers without their name (obviously) in the domain, e.g. Julia Evans at jvns.ca is often submitted; not with a 'Julia Evans:' prefix.
- CRConrad 3y ago> The title should be as posted on the blog Seems the HTML <title> attribute of his page is "Corporate Open Source Is Dead | Jeff Geerling". OK, that's not "Jeff Geerling: Corporate Open Source Is Dead" like on this HN page, but it's certainly not "jeffgeerling.com" either. The difference between a "Jeff Geerling:" prefix and a "| Jeff Geerling" suffix is rather small in comparison. So what, exactly, is "as posted on the blog"? >it would be weird if he put Jeff Geerling there (and he didn't). It's not like the main title within the page is just "Corporate Open Source Is Dead" either; there's a more prominent "Jeff Geerling" above that. So yes, he did. (Personally, I usually go with what's displayed on the browser window title / tab, i.e. the <title> attribute. AFAICR.)