The interesting thing here is the article winding itself up in tedious philosophical circles attempting to find some sort of objective truth. If a politician a

The interesting thing here is the article winding itself up in tedious philosophical circles attempting to find some sort of objective truth. If a politician approached issues like that they would get about 4 votes. People hate it, they want "coffee was gonna be bad but ended up being good" and easily digestible platitudes. Even platitudes require too much processing nowadays, just stick a few buzzwords into an elementary school level sentence. Politics almost has to be approached in this simplified way or arguments would quickly drill down to more essential questions. A discussion around immigration would become about humanities fundamental purpose and if we should be creating an Eden on earth or racing to expand into the cosmos.