4 ms·
For political messages, this doesn’t work—they ignore it. It just validates that you saw the message (and rewards the behavior).
by teeray 3y ago
For political messages, this doesn’t work—they ignore it. It just validates that you saw the message (and rewards the behavior).
- TheBigSalad 3y agoIf the messages are automated this works and is legally required. Many political messages may be a template but come from real humans. It's a way around the law.
- datadrivenangel 3y agoHuman pushes the button so it's not a machine. Does it still count if a human is supervising an autoclicker?
- Froedlich 2y agoCall from another jurisdiction, and good luck trying to enforce any laws. Back in the old days spam call centers were often in the Caribbean for that reason, but now that phone calls are so cheap, they might be anywhere.
- interbased 3y agoThis is why I don’t answer any calls from a number I don’t know. It just validates to a potential spam system that my number belongs to a real person.
- Froedlich 2y agoExactly. Which I have tried to explain (unsuccessfully, alas) too many times. We only answer calls from numbers we recognize. This has caused some interesting issues, though. My wife answered one of the unknown-callers on her cellphone anyway, and it turned out to be from her doctor's office. Who couldn't (or wouldn't) explain why the clerk was using per personal cellphone to call patients, or how they got the number. We still maintain a land line, and only eight individuals have my cellular number, only five have hers. Yet somewhere a dataset was purchased, and both our cellular numbers have propagated throughout the Electronic Medical Records system, often as the only contact number.