3 ms·
Looks pretty good! This is interesting from the release notes: > Starting in Ubuntu 24.04, Canonical no longer produces Vagrant images. This is due upstream De
by apple4ever 2y ago
Looks pretty good! This is interesting from the release notes:
> Starting in Ubuntu 24.04, Canonical no longer produces Vagrant images. This is due upstream Debian questions of maintainership and Canonical dropping vagrant from the Ubuntu archives.
Certainly will impact my workload.
- 0cf8612b2e1e 2y agoI am still sad that vagrant never took off. Sure it had some rough edges that could have been smoothed over with more eyes, but it really feels like a better development path.
- klysm 2y agoContainers are mostly better no?
- solatic 2y agoContainers still need to run on some kind of VM. If you're a small shop and the VM is managed for you by the cloud provider - fair enough. But a lot of larger enterprises still run servers managed in-house that are based off a golden image that is pre-configured to include observability agents, security agents, stuff that reports to centralized inventory management, in-house certificate authorities, etc. If you're a developer who ships a container, and it's only exposed to the stuff in the in-house server once it gets to a staging/pre-production environment - then you're missing a big part of the actual production environment in your dev environment. Vagrant can be a good choice here, depending on how customized the production servers are. Then there are plenty of cases where cloud servers are insufficient and your actual production environment includes on-prem hardware with more specialized setups, then the VM vs. container argument gets more murky.
- autra 2y agoI use vagrant quite a lot at work. This will impact me a lot :-/