3 ms·
I ran an experiment years ago. I used a throw-away email along with plus-addressing [0] to register and receive updates from democrat, republican and a handful
by robomartin 2y ago
I ran an experiment years ago. I used a throw-away email along with plus-addressing [0] to register and receive updates from democrat, republican and a handful of media organizations. I knew what the results would be: Unmitigated mayhem. And that's exactly what I got. It was interesting to watch for a few months.
All of these organizations shared (definitely) or sold (assumption) the customized email addresses far and wide. The only other possible explanations for what happened with these email addresses might be that they were stolen during a breach or that a bad actor with internal access shared or sold them. OK, I can buy either of these for one organization here or there, sure. When it happens across all organizations? No, the sharing or selling had to be intentional.
There was no effective way to stop the stream of emails that resulted from a handful of registrations. From my perspective, clicking on "unsubscribe" only served to confirm the email address was good. In other words, perhaps it did unsubscribe you from that specific organization, yet, what you actually accomplished was to provide them with a validated "live target" email they could sell or provide to another organization.
The result was an almost exponential growth of emails. Registering to, if I remember correctly, approximately six organizations led to a constant daily stream of emails form hundreds (did not count them) of groups. Crazy.
I never set out to quantify any of this or run study, so I don't have hard numbers to offer. All I can say is that the explosion of emails was universal across political alignment. Private media organizations also seemed to share email addresses with political party groups and candidates. In other words, I got emails from candidates and campaigns using email addresses I only provided to news organizations (identifiable through plus-addressing).
It didn't take long for me to kill the account and conclude that the iconic "The only winning move is not to play" [1] insight applies.
[0] https://gmail.googleblog.com/2008/03/2-hidden-ways-to-get-more-from-your.html https://gmail.googleblog.com/2008/03/2-hidden-ways-to-get-mo...
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpmGXeAtWUw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpmGXeAtWUw
- joeyphoen 2y agoSimilarly, I run my own email domain where all addresses go to the same inbox, so I can give all entities their own email address (e.g. hyatt@myemail.com, dmv@myemail.com). So far every single political email has come to the address that I ONLY gave the CA DMV.
- datadrivenangel 2y agoI do this with fastmail. The aliasing has gotten really good.
- itsdrewmiller 2y agoDid you register to vote through the DMV? Doing so might have gotten your email into their publicly accessible voter file (although I have no idea whether CA actually includes email on their voter file).
- jck 2y agoI wonder why the organizations doing shady stuff like this respect plus addressing. Seems like they could just strip out the + addressed stuff?