3 ms·
I think we don't understand each other. I'm not giving a moral or legal judgement on what Snowden in particular did. I'm saying, the information he disclosed sh
by ryanisnan 2y ago
I think we don't understand each other. I'm not giving a moral or legal judgement on what Snowden in particular did. I'm saying, the information he disclosed showed a vast and total violation of American's 4th amendment rights on behalf of the US government.
This KYC requirement seems to me, at a glance, as being a small erosion of our digital privacy.
- freedomben 2y agoYou're not wrong, but there is an important big difference between this and the Snowden revelations: The Snowden stuff was illegal and was being done in secret, and once exposed they had to stop. It was considered bad and embarrassing. This would be legal, and will set a strong precedent.
- webspinner 2y agoThey still haven't stopped.
- Repulsion9513 2y ago> The Snowden stuff was illegal I would say "unconstitutional" (it was on its face legal), but yup. > and was being done in secret Do open secrets count? We all knew they were spying. > and once exposed they had to stop BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA