4 ms·
Great project, but can the devs comment on https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2014-December/007999.html https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-d
by ementally 2y ago
Great project, but can the devs comment on https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2014-December/007999.html https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2014-December...
>[tor-dev] N reasons why the spooks love Tribler (Number N' will surprise you)
- amenhotep 2y agoECB and random.randint, wow. I'm not sure any dev comment could redeem crypto sins like that in such a project.
- tribler 2y agoDeadly mistakes from 2014. Full redesign and new Rust code.
- simcop2387 2y agoLooks like there was a discussion back then on the github issues, https://github.com/Tribler/tribler/issues/1066 https://github.com/Tribler/tribler/issues/1066 EDIT: Had a chance to look through it now, looks like they addressed all the concerns back by 2015 i.e. 1. Replacing the custom crypto code with more standard libraries (looks like they settled on NACL/libsodium's implementations). 2. Switched to AES-GCM and then later ChaChaPoly 3. Fixed up the tor protocol issues too. Probably more but there's a lot going on.
- jazzyjackson 2y agoAre you suggesting the subject line is inappropriate? I just thought spook meant spy (probably the only audience to whom strong encryption and anonymity actually matter) I guess there's an older more offensive meaning.