3 ms·
You know, I think this is good for your Oracle stock, and that by losing this trial they have dodged a significant bullet. Because the outcome of this trial wa
by zmmmmm 14y ago
You know, I think this is good for your Oracle stock, and that by losing this trial they have dodged a significant bullet.
Because the outcome of this trial was never going to be a never-ending stream of bountiful royalties for Oracle. It would be a one off damages payment from Google, a complete re-engineering of Android to systematically work around whatever infringement was found, and widescale abandonment and damage to the Java ecosystem and brand.
In my opinion Android has provided a lifeline to Java at a time when it was otherwise being abandoned wholesale by the next generation of programmers. It has kept new, intelligent young people learning the language for long enough for Oracle to bridge the widening gap between Java and other languages with Java7 and hopefully Java8. (Whether Oracle actually pulls this off is up to them ... but thanks to Android they have the opportunity).
- r00fus 14y agoReally all this was for Oracle was a gambit to control/profit from Android. That they were rebuffed (for now) means they lose out. Amorally speaking, they invested some money (in the legal costs) and lost on their bet. Also Java is a (unfortunate IMHO) defacto-standard in enterprise software. The alternatives are .NET or GTFO, really. This is not changing any time soon... Java does not need Android in any real sense (though does help it).
- zmmmmm 14y ago> Also Java is a (unfortunate IMHO) defacto-standard in enterprise software. Oh, totally agree, but > "not changing any time soon" It may still take a while but I think it'll greatly hasten Java's demise if new / young people aren't learning it.