3 ms·

There have already been cases like professors failing entire classes for plagiarism without any critical thought because an AI claimed their work was AI generat

There have already been cases like professors failing entire classes for plagiarism without any critical thought because an AI claimed their work was AI generated. Those were reversed because they were particularly egregious, but I can completely see individual students getting falsely accused of using AI and treated as guilty until proven innocent, going totally under the radar because single incidents don't get much public scrutiny.

causal 3y ago
Considering the public's persistent faith in lie detectors for humans, I don't hold a lot of hope we will be wiser about lie detectors for computers.
- ryandrake 3y ago
  It's going to get worse before it (unlikely) will get better. I predict within 10 years, we'll have at least one jurisdiction experimenting with AI-generated evidence, to help prosecutors get convictions. Prosecutor will push a button and computer will spit out a sworn statement that the defendant is guilty, this will be admissible, and juries will convict based on that evidence alone. Drug dogs who "hit" on command are already used as probable cause generators. Breathalyzers are basically magic boxes that produce "evidence" of a crime. It's inevitable that we're going to keep using AI and computers to automate convictions.
  - causal 3y ago
    This seemed implausible to me at first, then I remembered we've already had people submitting ChatGPT-hallucinated cases in court, so maybe not :(
    - qingcharles 3y ago
      And that's the one we caught. 99% of the time people aren't checking citations in motions to the court. Nobody has that much time. Things are rushed. I'm sure it is happening a lot more than we think. I use GPT to help write wiki entries for a site I'm working on and I have to be really on my game as it will hallucinate facts. I know some have got to have slipped through.

3 ms·

There have already been cases like professors failing entire classes for plagiarism without any critical thought because an AI claimed their work was AI generat

by dotnet00 3y ago

causal 3y ago
Considering the public's persistent faith in lie detectors for humans, I don't hold a lot of hope we will be wiser about lie detectors for computers.
- ryandrake 3y ago
  It's going to get worse before it (unlikely) will get better. I predict within 10 years, we'll have at least one jurisdiction experimenting with AI-generated evidence, to help prosecutors get convictions. Prosecutor will push a button and computer will spit out a sworn statement that the defendant is guilty, this will be admissible, and juries will convict based on that evidence alone. Drug dogs who "hit" on command are already used as probable cause generators. Breathalyzers are basically magic boxes that produce "evidence" of a crime. It's inevitable that we're going to keep using AI and computers to automate convictions.
  - causal 3y ago
    This seemed implausible to me at first, then I remembered we've already had people submitting ChatGPT-hallucinated cases in court, so maybe not :(
    - qingcharles 3y ago
      And that's the one we caught. 99% of the time people aren't checking citations in motions to the court. Nobody has that much time. Things are rushed. I'm sure it is happening a lot more than we think. I use GPT to help write wiki entries for a site I'm working on and I have to be really on my game as it will hallucinate facts. I know some have got to have slipped through.