4 ms·
I think the person you are replying to isn't too concerned with millions or billions of casualties. I may be wrong though.
by ImHereToVote 2y ago
I think the person you are replying to isn't too concerned with millions or billions of casualties. I may be wrong though.
- ThrowawayTestr 2y agoI take issue with this notion that matrix multiplication will lead to billions of deaths.
- reducesuffering 2y agoI take issue with this notion that sky carbon will lead to millions of deaths. I take issue with this notion that microscopic chain reactions could lead to billions of deaths.
- ThrowawayTestr 2y agoThere's is hard evidence for both of these claims. There is no evidence that AI will magically learn how to control the world's factories and turn us all into paperclips.
- reducesuffering 2y agoThen say that to make your case. Infantilizing the argument to matrix multiplication only makes it look silly and unconstructive. Social media is a bunch of registers being added to, doesn’t mean it doesn’t have insanely impactful effects to the real world.
- ImHereToVote 2y agoLook at this guy. Thinking that a bunch of database entries can alter society. What a loon.
- harimau777 2y agoOnce again, the article is not saying that. The article is saying that AI could (and appears to be) having a dramatic impact on society. In the past, similar dramatic changes have caused civilization altering disasters. Therefore, we cannot dismiss the possibility that AI will cause a civilization altering disaster.
- ImHereToVote 2y agohttps://img.ifunny.co/images/80ee9d354735cba79ca5baddc7865001a7a2c75f4d22046496e2716f2baca595_1.webp https://img.ifunny.co/images/80ee9d354735cba79ca5baddc786500...