3 ms·
The "other side" isn't being opposed to war. The other side is actively starting wars by invading its neighbors or trying to take their territory. Anduril has
by AlchemistCamp 2y ago
The "other side" isn't being opposed to war. The other side is actively starting wars by invading its neighbors or trying to take their territory.
Anduril has played a critical role in defending Ukraine, but it has not created weapons used to invade Russia or any other country.
> the same way I can see someone who is opposed to war being opposed to the usage.
Why wouldn't this person be opposed to the invading army instead? I could foresee a possible future where Aduril has done horrible things in future decades, but up through 2024, I see a lot of good done and not much to condemn.
- vasco 2y agoYou seem to not see a possibility for opposing companies like Anduril using names from fiction and also not liking other military companies from other opposing countries but such a position is valid.
- AlchemistCamp 2y agoGo ahead and make your case. Why is the invasion of Ukraine valid? Why would an invasion of Taiwan be valid? Can you make a coherent argument for either?
- vasco 2y agoI don't know what a specific war has to do with this. I really don't think you're interpreting what I'm saying correctly so I'll leave this be, because you seem to just want to figure out if I'm with you or against you where I was just making a neutral argument.
- AlchemistCamp 2y agoYou didn't make any coherent argument at all! It would have been more productive to actually explain in concrete terms what wrongdoing you believed Anduril was involved in rather than trying to guess at my perception or understanding of your comments.